Model Year | 2006 | 2015 | |
Model | Land Rover LR3 | Toyota Prius | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 113.6 in | 106.3 in | 7.3 in |
Length | 190.9 in | 176.4 in | 14.5 in |
Width | 75.4 in | 68.7 in | 6.7 in |
Height | 74.1 in | 58.7 in | 15.4 in |
Curb Weight | 5135 lb. | 3042 lb. | 2093 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 22.8 gal. | 11.9 gal. | 10.9 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 38.6 in | 1.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.2 in | 54.9 in | 4.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 52.7 in | -52.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 42.5 in | -0.1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 42.4 in | 37.6 in | 4.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.4 in | 53.1 in | 6.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 51.2 in | -51.2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 36.0 in | 1.6 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 40.1 in | 0.0 in | 40.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 42.8 in | 0.0 in | 42.8 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 36.3 in | 0.0 in | 36.3 in |
Total Legroom | 116.3 in (over 3 rows) | 78.5 in (over 2 rows) | 37.8 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.9 ft3 | 21.6 ft3 | -11.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 44.5 ft3 | 21.6 | 22.9 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 90.3 ft3 | 39.6 ft3 | 50.7 ft3 |
2006 Land Rover LR3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr SUV 216-horsepower 4.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
The third row seating configuration is just ingenious. Adults can ride comfortably and the seats stow flat with little effort. see full Land Rover LR3 review |
2005 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Three rows of seats. Seven people can actually fit. Two child sets and an adult can fit in the second row. Two human beings can fit in the third. see full Land Rover LR3 review |
2005 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
I CAN FIT IN THE 3RD ROW see full Land Rover LR3 review |
2015 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review |
2015 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius.