| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Land Rover LR4 and 2013 Ford C-MAX Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
| Model | Land Rover LR4 | Ford C-MAX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 113.6 in | 104.3 in | 9.3 in |
| Length | 190.1 in | 173.6 in | 16.5 in |
| Width | 75.4 in | 72.0 in | 3.4 in |
| Height | 74.1 in | 63.9 in | 10.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 5659 lb. | 3607 lb. | 2052 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 22.8 gal. | 13.5 gal. | 9.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 41.0 in | -0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.0 in | 55.9 in | 3.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 54.3 in | -54.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 40.4 in | 2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 42.4 in | 39.4 in | 3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.2 in | 55.2 in | 4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 51.9 in | -51.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 36.5 in | 1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 40.1 in | 0.0 in | 40.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 42.8 in | 0.0 in | 42.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 36.3 in | 0.0 in | 36.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 116.3 in (over 3 rows) | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 39.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.9 ft3 | 24.5 ft3 | -14.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 44.5 ft3 | 24.5 | 20 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 87.4 ft3 | 52.6 ft3 | 34.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Land Rover LR4
| 2010 Land Rover LR4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 375-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Drivers left leg can bang against some door hardware. This needs some minor re-think. Otherwise a nice elevated driving and upright position with tremendous forward visibility. Front pillar does not cause much of a blind spot. see full Land Rover LR4 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX
| 2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.
