| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Land Rover LR4 and 2013 Ford C-MAX Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
| Model | Land Rover LR4 | Ford C-MAX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,885 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,829 mm | 4,409 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,915 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,882 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,567 kg | 1,636 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 86 L | 51 L | 35 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,026 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,379 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,077 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,504 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,318 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 927 mm | 28 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 1,019 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,087 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 922 mm | 0 mm | 922 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,954 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 280 L | 694 L | -414 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,260 L | 24.5 | -23.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,475 L | 1,489 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Land Rover LR4
| 2010 Land Rover LR4 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 375-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
Drivers left leg can bang against some door hardware. This needs some minor re-think. Otherwise a nice elevated driving and upright position with tremendous forward visibility. Front pillar does not cause much of a blind spot. see full Land Rover LR4 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX
| 2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.
