| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2006 Ford Five Hundred Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2006 | |
| Model | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Ford Five Hundred | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5500 251 lb-ft@1750 |
3.0L V6 DOHC-4v 203 hp@5750 207 lb-ft@4500 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | CVT | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 104.8 in | 112.9 in | -8.1 in |
| Length | 171.5 in | 200.7 in | -29.2 in |
| Width | 77.4 in | 74.5 in | 2.9 in |
| Height | 64.4 in | 60.1 in | 4.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3680 lb. | 3814 lb. | -134 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 20.0 gal. | -1.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 39.4 in | 0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 57.8 in | -1.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 53.7 in | -53.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 43.1 in | 41.2 in | 1.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 38.6 in | 1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 57.6 in | -2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 53.6 in | -53.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.7 in | 41.9 in | -6.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 83.1 in (over 2 rows) | -4.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.3 ft3 | 21.2 ft3 | -0.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 51.0 ft3 | 21.2 ft3 | 29.8 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Five Hundred
| 2006 Ford Five Hundred Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long trips see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
REally comfortable see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 CVT AWD |
The Limited interior is very confy and I hear that the 2008 taurus is even better. see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
sits high, plenty of room see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
large seats and sits high see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 CVT AWD |
Ample room for 6+ see full Ford Five Hundred review |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 203-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
6 foot + individuals will love the leg room front and back and the command level seating (sits up higher than a regular car) see full Ford Five Hundred review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.
