| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2009 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2009 | |
| Model | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 104.8 in | 107.1 in | -2.3 in |
| Length | 171.5 in | 187.6 in | -16.1 in |
| Width | 77.4 in | 73.9 in | 3.5 in |
| Height | 64.4 in | 55.4 in | 9 in |
| Curb Weight | 3680 lb. | 3373 lb. | 307 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 2.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 38.6 in | 1.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 55.4 in | 1.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 53.6 in | -53.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 43.1 in | 42.7 in | 0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 34.7 in | 5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 53.4 in | 2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 46.8 in | -46.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.7 in | 30.3 in | 5.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 73 in (over 2 rows) | 5.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.3 ft3 | 13.1 ft3 | 7.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 51.0 ft3 | 13.1 ft3 | 37.9 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Mustang
| 2009 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Perfect seating position for both of us. Nice cush for your tush see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2009 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
There is very little rear leg room, but this car isn't meant to be a people carrier. It is nice that there are rear seats, but anyone that is not a small child will have a hard time sitting in the back. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2008 | 2dr Coupe supercharged 500hp 5.4L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
waste of space, no good for seating, so should have been made for storage see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Land Rover models.
