Model Year | 2014 | 2015 | |
Model | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Nissan Murano | |
Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5500 251 lb-ft@1750 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 260 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4400 |
|
Transmission | 9-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable CVT | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 104.8 in | 111.2 in | -6.4 in |
Length | 171.5 in | 192.8 in | -21.3 in |
Width | 77.4 in | 75.4 in | 2 in |
Height | 64.4 in | 66.6 in | -2.2 in |
Curb Weight | 3680 lb. | 3920 lb. | -240 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 19.0 gal. | -0.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 39.9 in | 0.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.6 in | 59.6 in | -3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 54.8 in | -54.8 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 43.1 in | 43.6 in | -0.5 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 39.8 in | -0.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 58.8 in | -3.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 55.2 in | -55.2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 35.7 in | 38.7 in | -3 in |
Total Legroom | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | 82.3 in (over 2 rows) | -3.5 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.3 ft3 | 39.6 ft3 | -19.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 51.0 ft3 | 69.9 ft3 | -18.9 ft3 |
2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
2015 Nissan Murano Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | I nearly ranked the new Nissan Murano's front seats ahead of its styling as reasons to buy one. With form-fitting contours and cushy-yet-supportive construction "inspired by NASA," they're that good. I wasn't able to drive the Murano all day, but felt like I easily could have. The 2015 Ford Edge's driver seat didn't initially strike me as especially comfortable. It felt flatter and less luxurious than that in the Nissan. But over the course of my test drive it seemed to fit and support me better and better. By the end it seemed very comfortable, yet still not quite as good as the Nissan's. The Edge Titanium's seats have a sportier appearance and shape than the SEL's, and might provide more lateral support. see full Nissan Murano review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Nissan Murano.