Model Year | 2017 | 2016 | |
Model | Lexus RX | Cadillac CTS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,911 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,890 mm | 4,966 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,895 mm | 1,834 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,720 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,915 kg | 1,658 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 73 L | 72 L | 1 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 996 mm | -995 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,438 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,120 mm | 1,082 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 953 mm | 40 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,425 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 899 mm | 66 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,085 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,981 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 521 L | 388 L | 133 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,594 L | 13.7 | -12.7 L |
2017 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Lexus RX has the roomiest back seat of the three, the Lincoln MKX the tightest. Very tall people will prefer the RX's. At 5-9, I'm not tall, and found the other two back seats much more comfortable, with higher, better shaped cushions providing better thigh support and seat backs that were not overly reclined. The RX's rear seat back felt overly reclined to me even in its most upright position. Since it adjusts, why didn't Lexus engineer it to adjust over a wider range? see full Lexus RX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Lexus RX.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac CTS.