| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Lexus RX and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2016 | |
| Model | Lexus RX | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.9 in | 107.1 in | 0.8 in |
| Length | 187.8 in | 188.3 in | -0.5 in |
| Width | 74.2 in | 75.4 in | -1.2 in |
| Height | 66.3 in | 54.4 in | 11.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 4178 lb. | 3526 lb. | 652 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.2 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 3.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.1 in | 37.6 in | 1.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.0 in | 56.3 in | 1.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.5 in | 54.9 in | 0.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 43.1 in | 42.0 in | 1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.7 in | 34.8 in | 2.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.6 in | 52.2 in | 5.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.5 in | 47.4 in | 7.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 30.6 in | 6.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 79.9 in (over 2 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 7.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 40.0 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 26.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 80.3 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | 66.8 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lexus RX
| 2015 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Lexus RX has the roomiest back seat of the three, the Lincoln MKX the tightest. Very tall people will prefer the RX's. At 5-9, I'm not tall, and found the other two back seats much more comfortable, with higher, better shaped cushions providing better thigh support and seat backs that were not overly reclined. The RX's rear seat back felt overly reclined to me even in its most upright position. Since it adjusts, why didn't Lexus engineer it to adjust over a wider range? see full Lexus RX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Lexus RX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lexus RX.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
| 2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Lexus models.
