Model Year | 2016 | 2015 | |
Model | Lexus RX | Mercedes-Benz M-Class | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,890 mm | 4,803 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,895 mm | 1,910 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,720 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,915 kg | 2,155 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 73 L | 93 L | -20 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 988 mm | -987 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,438 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,120 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 978 mm | 15 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,425 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 975 mm | -10 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,085 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,999 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 521 L | 1,025 L | 520 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,594 L | 2,010 L | -1 L |
2016 Lexus RX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Lexus RX has the roomiest back seat of the three, the Lincoln MKX the tightest. Very tall people will prefer the RX's. At 5-9, I'm not tall, and found the other two back seats much more comfortable, with higher, better shaped cushions providing better thigh support and seat backs that were not overly reclined. The RX's rear seat back felt overly reclined to me even in its most upright position. Since it adjusts, why didn't Lexus engineer it to adjust over a wider range? see full Lexus RX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Lexus RX.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mercedes-Benz M-Class.