Lincoln MKZ Lincoln MKZ 2012 Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2016

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Lincoln MKZ (2012) vs. Ford Mustang (2016) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Lincoln MKZ and 2016 Ford Mustang specs.

2012 Lincoln MKZ and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications

Model Year 2012 2016  
Model Lincoln MKZ Ford Mustang  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body 4dr Sedan 2dr Coupe  
      Difference
Wheelbase 2,728 mm 2,720 mm 0 mm
Length 4,841 mm 4,783 mm 0 mm
Width 1,834 mm 1,915 mm 0 mm
Height 1,445 mm 1,382 mm 0 mm
Curb Weight 1,632 kg 1,599 kg 0 kg
Fuel Capacity 66 L 61 L 5 L
Headroom, Row 1 983 mm 955 mm 28 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1 1,458 mm 1,430 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1 1,372 mm 1,394 mm 0 mm
Legroom, Row 1 1,074 mm 1,067 mm 0 mm
Headroom, Row 2 960 mm 884 mm 76 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2 1,435 mm 1,326 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2 1,354 mm 1,204 mm 0 mm
Legroom, Row 2 942 mm 777 mm 165 mm
Total Legroom 2,017 mm (over 2 rows) 1,844 mm (over 2 rows) 1 mm
Cargo Volume 467 L 382 L 85 L

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Lincoln MKZ

2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2013 Seat evaluations are highly subjective. For me, the MKZ's standard front seats are very good, but short of outstanding. Compared to the seats in the Fusion, they're more firmly contoured but have smaller side bolsters. The optional multi-contour seats might address the bolster deficit. But few people are going to drive this car in a manner that requires much lateral support. see full Lincoln MKZ review
2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Fusion. In the MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Lincoln MKZ

2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid
CVT FWD
I love driving in luxury, and this car delivers much of it. From the cooled/heated seats to the delicious feel of the leather seating surfaces, this car offers more than adequate comfort...and it is a luxury automobile after all. I would expect no less from Lincoln. see full Lincoln MKZ review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang

2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Lincoln models.