Model Year | 2015 | 2010 | |
Model | Lincoln MKZ | Toyota Highlander | |
Engine | 2.0L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 105 kW@6000 175 Nm@4000 |
3.5L V6 Hybrid DOHC-4v 183 kW@6000 317 Nm@4800 |
|
Transmission | CVT | CVT | |
Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,850 mm | 2,789 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,930 mm | 4,785 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,864 mm | 1,910 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,478 mm | 1,730 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,736 kg | 2,045 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 62 L | 73 L | -11 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 963 mm | 1,031 mm | 962 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,466 mm | 1,516 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 930 mm | 1,019 mm | 929 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,367 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 940 mm | 973 mm | -33 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,397 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,074 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 742 mm | -742 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,812 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 436 L | 292 L | 144 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 15.4 | 1,198 L | 14.4 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.4 | 2,701 L | 13.4 |
2015 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Ford Fusion. In the Lincoln MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKZ.
2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr SUV 187-horsepower 2.7L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lots of room in the second row, including seats that recline and move back & forth. Having the third row as an option for occasional use was really the deciding factor. see full Toyota Highlander review |
2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6 Hybrid CVT AWD |
Third row minimal legroom see full Toyota Highlander review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Only two seats in the 2nd row, very small leg room in the 3rd row. see full Toyota Highlander review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
seats were hard and flat. Even top of the line luxury model seats were a big disappointment . . . one of the principal reasons we did not choose this vehicle see full Toyota Highlander review |