| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Mazda CX-5 and 2010 Toyota Highlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2010 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-5 | Toyota Highlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 106.3 in | 109.8 in | -3.5 in |
| Length | 179.3 in | 188.4 in | -9.1 in |
| Width | 72.4 in | 75.2 in | -2.8 in |
| Height | 65.7 in | 68.1 in | -2.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3212 lb. | 3847 lb. | -635 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 14.8 gal. | 19.2 gal. | -4.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.1 in | 40.6 in | -0.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.5 in | 59.7 in | -2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.2 in | 56.7 in | -1.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 43.2 in | -2.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 40.1 in | -1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.5 in | 59.5 in | -4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.7 in | 56.5 in | -2.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 38.3 in | 1 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 36.3 in | -36.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 55.0 in | -55 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 42.3 in | -42.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 29.2 in | -29.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 80.3 in (over 2 rows) | 110.7 in (over 3 rows) | -30.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 34.1 ft3 | 10.3 ft3 | 23.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 34.1 | 42.3 ft3 | -8.2 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 64.8 ft3 | 95.4 ft3 | -30.6 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-5
| 2016 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's enough room for four adults inside the Mazda CX-5. But the Honda CR-V and some others are considerably roomier. Want an occasional third-row seat? While Nissan and Volkswagen offer one in their compact crossovers, Mazda does not. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Mazda CX-5
| 2016 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Soon after I bought the Mazda, I did an 8 hour trip in it. I found the seat comfort to be most satisfactory. I had no trouble finding a comfortable driving position using the power seat, and, the lumbar support. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Highlander
| 2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 187-horsepower 2.7L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lots of room in the second row, including seats that recline and move back & forth. Having the third row as an option for occasional use was really the deciding factor. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6 Hybrid CVT AWD |
Third row minimal legroom see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Only two seats in the 2nd row, very small leg room in the 3rd row. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
seats were hard and flat. Even top of the line luxury model seats were a big disappointment . . . one of the principal reasons we did not choose this vehicle see full Toyota Highlander review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
