| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2022 Mazda CX-5 and 2010 Toyota Highlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2022 | 2010 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-5 | Toyota Highlander | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 320 lb-ft@2500 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 270 hp@6200 248 lb-ft@4700 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 106.2 in | 109.8 in | -3.6 in |
| Length | 180.1 in | 188.4 in | -8.3 in |
| Width | 72.6 in | 75.2 in | -2.6 in |
| Height | 65.4 in | 68.1 in | -2.7 in |
| Curb Weight | 3856 lb. | 4178 lb. | -322 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 14.8 gal. | 19.2 gal. | -4.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 40.6 in | -0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.1 in | 59.7 in | -2.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.2 in | 56.7 in | -1.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 43.2 in | -2.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 40.1 in | -1.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.8 in | 59.5 in | -4.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.3 in | 56.5 in | -1.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.6 in | 38.3 in | 1.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 36.3 in | -36.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 55.0 in | -55 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 42.3 in | -42.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 29.2 in | -29.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | 110.7 in (over 3 rows) | -30.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 30.8 ft3 | 10.3 ft3 | 20.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 30.8 | 42.3 ft3 | -11.5 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 59.3 ft3 | 95.4 ft3 | -36.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2022 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2022 Mazda CX-5.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Highlander
| 2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 187-horsepower 2.7L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lots of room in the second row, including seats that recline and move back & forth. Having the third row as an option for occasional use was really the deciding factor. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6 Hybrid CVT AWD |
Third row minimal legroom see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Only two seats in the 2nd row, very small leg room in the 3rd row. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
seats were hard and flat. Even top of the line luxury model seats were a big disappointment . . . one of the principal reasons we did not choose this vehicle see full Toyota Highlander review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
