| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Mazda CX-5 and 2006 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2006 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-5 | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 320 lb-ft@2500 |
1.8L I4 DOHC-4v 164 hp@7600 126 lb-ft@4400 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed manual | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,549 mm | 4,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,842 mm | 1,775 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,659 mm | 1,565 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,735 kg | 1,270 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 50 L | 6 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,011 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,214 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 922 mm | -921 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 617 L | 258 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 1,506 L | 0 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
| 2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota Matrix
| 2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
a lot of place, even for tall people. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2005 | 4dr Hatch 130-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of room in rear seats while both front seats are being used, enough room for 5 adults. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2006 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
very uncomfortable and not ergonomic at all. especially with child sits. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Were flat and didnt grip you well see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
