Mazda CX-5 (2018) vs. Volvo C70 (2010) Specs

vs.

◆

2018 Mazda CX-5 and 2010 Volvo C70 Specifications

Model Year	2018	2010
Model	Mazda CX-5	Volvo C70
Engine	2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 187 hp@6000 186 lb-ft@4000	turbocharged 2.5L I5 DOHC-4v 227 hp@5000 236 lb-ft@1500
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	5-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	FWD	FWD
Body	4dr SUV	2dr Hardtop conv.
			Difference
Wheelbase	106.2 in	103.9 in	2.3 in
Length	179.1 in	180.4 in	-1.3 in
Width	72.5 in	72.3 in	0.2 in
Height	65.3 in	55.1 in	10.2 in
Curb Weight	3563 lb.	3792 lb.	-229 lb.
Fuel Capacity	14.8 gal.	16.4 gal.	-1.6 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	39.7 in	38.2 in	1.5 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	57.1 in	53.6 in	3.5 in
Hip Room, Row 1	55.2 in	53.1 in	2.1 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.0 in	42.3 in	-1.3 in
Headroom, Row 2	39.0 in	36.4 in	2.6 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	54.8 in	47.0 in	7.8 in
Hip Room, Row 2	55.3 in	41.5 in	13.8 in
Legroom, Row 2	39.6 in	33.9 in	5.7 in
Total Legroom	80.6 in (over 2 rows)	76.2 in (over 2 rows)	4.4 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	30.9 ft³	12.8 ft³	18.1 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	59.6 ft³	12.8 ft³	46.8 ft³

2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Volvo C70.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.