Mazda CX-5 (2018) vs. Volvo C70 (2010) Specs

vs.

◆

2018 Mazda CX-5 and 2010 Volvo C70 Specifications

Model Year	2018	2010
Model	Mazda CX-5	Volvo C70
Engine	2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 187 hp@6000 186 lb-ft@4000	turbocharged 2.5L I5 DOHC-4v 227 hp@5000 236 lb-ft@1500
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	5-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	FWD	FWD
Body	4dr SUV	2dr Hardtop conv.
			Difference
Wheelbase	2,697 mm	2,639 mm	0 mm
Length	4,549 mm	4,582 mm	0 mm
Width	1,842 mm	1,836 mm	0 mm
Height	1,659 mm	1,400 mm	0 mm
Curb Weight	1,616 kg	1,720 kg	0 kg
Fuel Capacity	56 L	62 L	-6 L
Headroom, Row 1	1,008 mm	970 mm	-969 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1	1,450 mm	1,361 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1	1,402 mm	1,349 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 1	1,041 mm	1,074 mm	0 mm
Headroom, Row 2	991 mm	925 mm	66 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2	1,392 mm	1,194 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2	1,405 mm	1,054 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 2	1,006 mm	861 mm	-860 mm
Total Legroom	2,047 mm (over 2 rows)	1,935 mm (over 2 rows)	1 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum	875 L	362 L	513 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum	1,688 L	12.8	-11.8 L

2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Volvo C70.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.