Model Year | 2018 | 2010 | |
Model | Mazda CX-5 | Volvo XC60 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,697 mm | 2,774 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,549 mm | 4,628 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 1,890 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,659 mm | 1,712 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,616 kg | 1,820 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 56 L | 70 L | -14 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 965 mm | -964 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,450 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,377 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 968 mm | 23 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,405 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,006 mm | 925 mm | -924 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,971 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 875 L | 872 L | 3 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,688 L | 1,909 L | 0 L |
2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Volvo XC60.