| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Mazda CX-9 and 2016 Chevrolet Trax Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Chevrolet Trax | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 2,555 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,070 mm | 4,247 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,935 mm | 1,775 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,730 mm | 1,674 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,956 kg | 1,383 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 53 L | 23 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 1,006 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,313 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,036 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 986 mm | 986 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,341 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,288 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 907 mm | -906 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,445 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,110 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 823 mm | 0 mm | 823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,943 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 487 L | 530 L | -43 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,345 L | 18.7 | -17.7 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,852 L | 1,371 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mazda CX-9
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Access to the 3rd row is better than any other 7 passenger SUV I drove. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to third row, good leg room in second and third row. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Long legroom in 2nd row seating, fold-down 3rd row seating has large seat cushions for adults see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Third row is plenty comfortable for two adults on a long trip. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
highly adjustable, nice and firm see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Front seats felt snug and the center console intruded on the driver side knee room. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
I would rather have more second row leg room and no third row. My third row is always folded down for cargo anyway. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Trax
| 2016 Chevrolet Trax Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's much more room inside the Trax than many people expect given its compact exterior. At 5-9, I could sit behind myself with a few inches of knee room to spare. But if the people in the front seats are taller than me, those in the back seat better be shorter. The Renegade and 500X have about the same amount of rear knee room as the Trax. They have a couple inches more shoulder room, though, so fitting three people in back is a little less of a squeeze. (It will still help if they enjoy physical contact with one another.) The Honda HR-V isn't wider, but does have a few more inches of rear legroom. On the other hand, the rear seats in the Nissan JUKE and MINI Countryman are tighter than that in the Trax. see full Chevrolet Trax review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Trax
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Trax.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
