| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Mazda CX-9 and 2003 Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2003 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | ||
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mazda CX-9
| 2010 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to third row, good leg room in second and third row. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Access to the 3rd row is better than any other 7 passenger SUV I drove. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2003 .
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
