| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2018 Ford C-MAX Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2018 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Ford C-MAX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,085 mm | 4,409 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,935 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,727 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,964 kg | 1,651 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 51 L | 25 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,001 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 927 mm | -926 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,445 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,110 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 823 mm | 0 mm | 823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 487 L | 694 L | -207 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,368 L | 24.5 | -23.5 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,852 L | 1,489 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Ford C-MAX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Ford C-MAX.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
