| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2003 Ford ZX2 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2003 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Ford ZX2 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford ZX2
| 2003 Ford ZX2 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 2dr Coupe 130-horsepower 2.0L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Comfort isn't bad, but it could sure use a center armrest. And I haven't found a suitable one on the aftermarket. see full Ford ZX2 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
