Mazda CX-9 Mazda CX-9 2010 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac Ford *Explorer Sport Trac 2006

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Mazda CX-9 (2010) vs. Ford *Explorer Sport Trac (2006) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 Mazda CX-9 and 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac specs.

2010 Mazda CX-9 and 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac Specifications

Model Year 2010 2006  
Model Mazda CX-9 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mazda CX-9

2010 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review
2009 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Easy access to third row, good leg room in second and third row. see full Mazda CX-9 review
2009 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
Access to the 3rd row is better than any other 7 passenger SUV I drove. see full Mazda CX-9 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac

2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
The seats are much improved over older explorers. You can ride for 4 hours and not feel tired when you get out of the truck. I have heated leather, which I recommend. The heat is in the lumbar, as well as seat bottom. Very nice seats. see full Ford *Explorer Sport Trac review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.