Mazda CX-9 (2012) vs. Ford *Explorer Sport Trac (2006) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac specs.
2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac Specifications
Model Year |
2012 |
2006 |
|
Model |
Mazda CX-9 |
Ford *Explorer Sport Trac |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
2011 |
4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave).
see full Mazda CX-9 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford *Explorer Sport Trac
2007 |
4dr SUT 292-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The seats are much improved over older explorers. You can ride for 4 hours and not feel tired when you get out of the truck. I have heated leather, which I recommend. The heat is in the lumbar, as well as seat bottom. Very nice seats.
see full Ford *Explorer Sport Trac review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Mazda models.