| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Mazda CX-9 and 2017 Ford Fusion Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2017 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Ford Fusion | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,085 mm | 4,869 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,935 mm | 1,852 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,727 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,964 kg | 1,549 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 62 L | 14 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 996 mm | -995 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 960 mm | 31 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 973 mm | -972 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,445 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,110 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 823 mm | 0 mm | 823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,035 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 487 L | 453 L | 34 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,368 L | 16.0 | -15 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,852 L | 16.0 | -14 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Ford Fusion
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Ford Fusion.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
