| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2015 Honda Pilot Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2015 | |
| Model | Mazda CX-9 | Honda Pilot | |
| Engine | 3.7L V6 DOHC-4v 273 hp@6250 270 lb-ft@4250 |
3.5L V6 OHC-4v 250 hp@5700 253 lb-ft@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 2,774 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,085 mm | 4,862 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,935 mm | 1,994 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,727 mm | 1,803 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,062 kg | 2,040 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 79 L | -3 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,562 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 1,011 mm | 990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,580 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 970 mm | -71 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,445 mm | 1,496 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,110 mm | 1,229 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 823 mm | 815 mm | 8 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,845 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 487 L | 510 L | -23 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,368 L | 1,351 L | 0 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,852 L | 2,464 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Honda Pilot
| 2015 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Honda Pilot
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Honda Pilot.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
