Mazda CX-9 (2012) vs. Mazda Mazda3 (2003) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2003 Mazda Mazda3 specs.
2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2003 Mazda Mazda3 Specifications
Model Year |
2012 |
2003 |
|
Model |
Mazda CX-9 |
Mazda Mazda3 |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
2011 |
4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave).
see full Mazda CX-9 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Mazda Mazda3
2004 |
4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 4-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seats are firm, comfortable and provide the support you need in spirited driving. Even after driving long distances I have never had any aches.
see full Mazda Mazda3 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Mazda models.