Mazda CX-9 (2012) vs. Mazda Tribute (2003) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2003 Mazda Tribute specs.
2012 Mazda CX-9 and 2003 Mazda Tribute Specifications
Model Year |
2012 |
2003 |
|
Model |
Mazda CX-9 |
Mazda Tribute |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
2011 |
4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave).
see full Mazda CX-9 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Mazda Tribute
2003 Mazda Tribute Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2003 |
4dr SUV 200-horsepower 3.0L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
A bit short seat and not enough supportive.
see full Mazda Tribute review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Mazda models.