Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
Model | Mazda CX-9 | Volvo XC70 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Wagon | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,875 mm | 2,814 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 5,085 mm | 4,839 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,935 mm | 1,925 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,727 mm | 1,603 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,964 kg | 1,856 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 70 L | 6 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 980 mm | 11 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 879 mm | -878 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,445 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,110 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 823 mm | 0 mm | 823 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,943 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 487 L | 943 L | -456 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,368 L | 33.3 | -32.3 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,852 L | 2,039 L | 0 L |
2010 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to third row, good leg room in second and third row. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Access to the 3rd row is better than any other 7 passenger SUV I drove. see full Mazda CX-9 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Volvo XC70.