| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Mazda Mazda5 and 2017 Honda Pilot Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2017 | |
| Model | Mazda Mazda5 | Honda Pilot | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,751 mm | 2,819 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,610 mm | 4,940 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,755 mm | 1,996 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,631 mm | 1,773 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,550 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 74 L | -14 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 1,019 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,410 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,344 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 1,021 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,412 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,481 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 894 mm | 975 mm | -81 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 942 mm | 988 mm | -46 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,250 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,039 mm | 1,133 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 780 mm | 810 mm | -30 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,708 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,824 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 320 L | 467 L | -147 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,257 L | 1,325 L | 0 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,008 L | 2,376 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mazda Mazda5
| 2010 Mazda Mazda5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Minivan 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
CAN SEAT 6 PEOPLE see full Mazda Mazda5 review |
| 2010 | 4dr Minivan 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
2nd-row seat slide fore/aft and recline. Ample room even for larger passengers to be comfortable on long trips. see full Mazda Mazda5 review |
| 2010 | 4dr Minivan 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
6-passenger seating adequate for older teens, stows away for hauling capacity. see full Mazda Mazda5 review |
| 2010 Mazda Mazda5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Minivan 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
LAST ROW TOO SMALL FOR ADULTS see full Mazda Mazda5 review |
| 2010 | 4dr Minivan 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Not great support in either the seat cushion or back. However, driving position is fine. see full Mazda Mazda5 review |
| 2010 | 4dr Minivan 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Too small for a road trip with 6 grown men. The 2nd row is tight but not uncomfortable for me (6 ft tall). The 3rd row is for children or pets only. see full Mazda Mazda5 review |
| 2009 | 4dr Minivan 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Not enough leg room overall in the car. As a larger driver (6'3"), I need to push the drivers seat back. So the kid behind me has to get pushed back. Well the third row can't move back, so I've I'm driving, no one can sit in the third row driver's side and have any leg room. This is the worst for kids in full-size car seats, because the seats position their legs higher and forward of where a small adult's would be with no car seat. see full Mazda Mazda5 review |
| 2009 | 4dr Minivan 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The six-chair setup of the 5 means that luggage space is limited, and some may find the "three rows of two" arrangement adds difficulty to monitoring children in the far rear seats. In order to carry significant cargo the seats need to be removed. see full Mazda Mazda5 review |
| 2009 | 4dr Minivan 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The center seats are adequate for tall adults. Judicious positioning of the front and center seats should get you better results than a subcompact. The third-row rear seats are for kids only. see full Mazda Mazda5 review |
| 2009 | 4dr Minivan 153-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The back seat is made for very small folks only. The middle row seat belts are placed somewhat far back. see full Mazda Mazda5 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot
| 2017 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Mazda models.
