| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Mercedes-Benz C-Class and 2014 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2014 | |
| Model | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 106.9 in | 107.1 in | -0.2 in |
| Length | 178.4 in | 188.5 in | -10.1 in |
| Width | 68.0 in | 73.9 in | -5.9 in |
| Height | 55.6 in | 55.8 in | -0.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 3405 lb. | 3501 lb. | -96 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.4 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 0.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.9 in | 38.5 in | 0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.1 in | 55.3 in | -2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.9 in | 53.4 in | -1.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 42.4 in | -0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.3 in | 34.7 in | 2.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.3 in | 47.8 in | 6.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.5 in | 46.8 in | 7.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.0 in | 29.8 in | 3.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 74.7 in (over 2 rows) | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 2.5 in |
| Cargo Volume | 12.2 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | -1.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy to drive for many hours at as time, good trip car. Very comfortable, smooth ride. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 154hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Rear seats are narrow and hard. The centre seat is only usable for very small people on very short trips. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
There is no rear seat room. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
fake leather is too cheap for a m-b. seats too hard. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.
