| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class and 2003 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2003 | |
| Model | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Mustang
| 2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
The existence of a rear seat, comfortable or not, was a major factor. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2003 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 2dr Convertible 190-horsepower 3.8L V6 4-speed automatic RWD |
Front seats are not particularly comfortable but not so different from most cars I've driven. I've already bought seat cushions. I've put long days on a bicycle I ride regularly which is more comfortable than anything between a vintage VW Beetle and a modern Buick with the exception of a Renault 16. In fact most car makers would do well to go out and find a 1972 Renault 16 and take very, very careful note of the seats. But seat comfort was secondary to other considerations such as water-tightness of the convertible. Not a deal-breaker. see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.
