| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class and 2016 Toyota Sienna Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | Toyota Sienna | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,761 mm | 3,030 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,630 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,770 mm | 1,984 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,430 mm | 1,750 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,600 kg | 1,955 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 66 L | 76 L | -10 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 942 mm | 1,041 mm | 941 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,389 mm | 1,651 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,328 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 937 mm | 1,008 mm | 936 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,400 mm | 1,641 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,394 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 848 mm | 955 mm | -107 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 973 mm | -973 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,552 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,278 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,908 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,906 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 351 L | 1,107 L | 350 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 12.4 | 2,466 L | 10.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.4 | 4,248 L | 8.4 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna
| 2016 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support. The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others. see full Toyota Sienna review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.
