Mercedes-Benz GLK Mercedes-Benz GLK 2013 Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2007

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Mercedes-Benz GLK (2013) vs. Ford Mustang (2007) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK and 2007 Ford Mustang specs.

2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK and 2007 Ford Mustang Specifications

Model Year 2013 2007  
Model Mercedes-Benz GLK Ford Mustang  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body 4dr SUV 2dr Coupe  
      Difference
Wheelbase 108.5 in 107.1 in 1.4 in
Length 178.3 in 187.6 in -9.3 in
Width 74.3 in 73.9 in 0.4 in
Height 66.9 in 55.4 in 11.5 in
Curb Weight 4079 lb. 3373 lb. 706 lb.
Fuel Capacity 17.4 gal. 16.0 gal. 1.4 gal.
Headroom, Row 1 39.8 in 38.6 in 1.2 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1 55.2 in 55.4 in -0.2 in
Hip Room, Row 1 53.2 in 53.6 in -0.4 in
Legroom, Row 1 41.4 in 42.7 in -1.3 in
Headroom, Row 2 39.7 in 34.7 in 5 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2 55.4 in 53.4 in 2 in
Hip Room, Row 2 52.5 in 46.8 in 5.7 in
Legroom, Row 2 35.1 in 30.3 in 4.8 in
Total Legroom 76.5 in (over 2 rows) 73 in (over 2 rows) 3.5 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum 23.3 ft3 13.1 ft3 10.2 ft3
Cargo Volume, Maximum 54.7 ft3 13.1 ft3 41.6 ft3

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK

2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
Expect the GLK to grow when it is next fully redesigned. A smaller MLK is on the way to battle the upcoming Audi Q3 and just-arrived BMW X1. For 2013, the GLK's body structure remains essentially the same, so rear seat knee room remains just sufficient for a man of average height sitting behind another such man. (Headroom, on the other hand, is abundant.) Among competitors, only the Infiniti EX37 has a tighter rear seat. The Audi, BMW, and Volvo all offer knees another inch or three. Seat comfort is debatable. To my bottom, the GLK's seats feel overly firm. Cargo space is similarly short of the segment average. The GLK's 54.7 cubic feet isn't far behind the Audi's 57.3 but well below the X3's 63.3. That truncated tail has a downside beyond aesthetics. But do these shortcomings really matter? For most people nearly all of the time, there's enough space. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK

2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 4dr SUV turbocharged 168hp 2.1L I4 Diesel
7-speed shiftable automatic AWD
We are a couple with no kids and we rarely have visitors so the cramped rear seating is not a problem. Someone with teenage kids will want to seriously reconsider before getting a GLK. I know my Mom would not appreciate the ingress/egress ease as she has some limited mobility. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Ford Mustang

2007 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2006 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review
2007 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 2dr Coupe supercharged 500hp 5.4L V8
6-speed manual RWD
waste of space, no good for seating, so should have been made for storage see full Ford Mustang review
2008 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8
5-speed manual RWD
There is very little rear leg room, but this car isn't meant to be a people carrier. It is nice that there are rear seats, but anyone that is not a small child will have a hard time sitting in the back. see full Ford Mustang review
2007 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual RWD
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.