Model Year | 2015 | 2015 | |
Model | Mercedes-Benz M-Class | Volkswagen Tiguan | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 2,604 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,803 mm | 4,432 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,910 mm | 1,808 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,796 mm | 1,666 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,155 kg | 1,544 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 93 L | 64 L | 29 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 988 mm | 993 mm | -5 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,486 mm | 1,427 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,019 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 991 mm | -13 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,483 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 909 mm | 66 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,999 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,928 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,025 L | 674 L | -673 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,010 L | 1,589 L | 1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mercedes-Benz M-Class.
2015 Volkswagen Tiguan Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2014 | Based on the specs, the Tiguan suffers from insufficient dimensions. It's 3.6 inches less lengthy than the Escape, and as a result has an inch less legroom. And the Ford falls near the bottom of the segment in this spec. In the real world, though, the Tiguan's rear seat feels roomier and more comfortable than the Escape's and in the ballpark with the class leaders. A relatively large seat bottom is high enough off the floor to provide adults with thigh support. The rear seat back is more comfortably shaped than the compact crossover norm, and reclines. One nit: hard plastic isn't the most comfortable surface for a rear armrest. see full Volkswagen Tiguan review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Volkswagen Tiguan.