| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Mercedes-Benz R-Class and 2013 Ford Focus Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2013 | |
| Model | Mercedes-Benz R-Class | Ford Focus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 126.6 in | 104.3 in | 22.3 in |
| Length | 203.0 in | 171.6 in | 31.4 in |
| Width | 75.7 in | 71.8 in | 3.9 in |
| Height | 65.4 in | 57.7 in | 7.7 in |
| Curb Weight | 4829 lb. | 2920 lb. | 1909 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 25.1 gal. | 12.4 gal. | 12.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.8 in | 38.3 in | 1.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 60.3 in | 55.6 in | 4.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 53.9 in | -53.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 39.8 in | 41.9 in | -2.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 40.4 in | 37.9 in | 2.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.6 in | 53.7 in | 5.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 52.7 in | -52.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.2 in | 33.2 in | 3 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 37.2 in | 0.0 in | 37.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 52.8 in | 0.0 in | 52.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 32.4 in | 0.0 in | 32.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 108.4 in (over 3 rows) | 75.1 in (over 2 rows) | 33.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 15.3 ft3 | 23.8 ft3 | -8.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 42.2 ft3 | 23.8 | 18.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 85.0 ft3 | 44.8 ft3 | 40.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mercedes-Benz R-Class
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz R-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Very roomie see full Mercedes-Benz R-Class review |
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz R-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Three different lumbar pumps...don't seem to be very different in what is inflated. see full Mercedes-Benz R-Class review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Focus
| 2013 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | Like other recently designed Fords, the Focus has a tighter rear seat than most competitors. At 5-9, I can sit behind myself with perhaps an inch to spare. see full Ford Focus review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Focus
| 2013 Ford Focus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr Sedan 103-horsepower 1.6L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The front passenger seat is cramped, especially on long journeys. My wife is smaller, so its fine for her, but Im an average sized male, about 5'11" and my left knee always aches after a while. see full Ford Focus review |
| 2012 | 4dr Hatch 160-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
Driver seat cushion very uncomfortable after 30 minutes; feels like no cushion in seat see full Ford Focus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.
