| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Mercedes-Benz SLK and 2017 Cadillac ATS Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2017 | |
| Model | Mercedes-Benz SLK | Cadillac ATS | |
| Engine | 5.4L V8 OHC-3v 355 hp@5750 376 lb-ft@4000 |
turbocharged 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 464 hp@5850 445 lb-ft@3500 |
|
| Transmission | 7-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Body | 2dr Hardtop conv. | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 95.7 in | 109.3 in | -13.6 in |
| Length | 160.7 in | 183.6 in | -22.9 in |
| Width | 70.4 in | 72.5 in | -2.1 in |
| Height | 51.0 in | 54.8 in | -3.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 3420 lb. | 3745 lb. | -325 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 2.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.9 in | 37.6 in | 0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 52.2 in | 54.1 in | -1.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.6 in | 54.1 in | 0.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.5 in | 42.3 in | 0.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 35.1 in | -35.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 51.1 in | -51.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 44.5 in | -44.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 33.5 in | -33.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 42.5 in (over 1 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | -33.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 6.5 ft3 | 10.4 ft3 | -3.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 9.8 ft3 | 10.4 ft3 | -0.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Mercedes-Benz SLK
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz SLK Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 2dr Hardtop conv. | Ample leg room and headroom - up to about 6ft 5 is fine I'm 6ft3 and with the roof off I don't get too ruffled unless I go over about 85 mph Lots of other things to like (and the running costs arent too horrendous) but I'm limiting myself to my top three see full Mercedes-Benz SLK review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS
| 2017 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS.
See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.
