| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Mercedes-Benz SLK and 2017 Cadillac ATS Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2017 | |
| Model | Mercedes-Benz SLK | Cadillac ATS | |
| Engine | 5.4L V8 OHC-3v 265 kW@5750 510 Nm@4000 |
turbocharged 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 346 kW@5850 603 Nm@3500 |
|
| Transmission | 7-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Body | 2dr Hardtop conv. | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,431 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,082 mm | 4,663 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,788 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,295 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,551 kg | 1,699 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 61 L | 9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 963 mm | 955 mm | 8 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,326 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,387 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 892 mm | -892 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,298 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,130 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0 mm | 851 mm | -851 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,080 mm (over 1 row) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 184 L | 294 L | -110 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 278 L | 10.4 | 267.6 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Mercedes-Benz SLK
| 2006 Mercedes-Benz SLK Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 2dr Hardtop conv. | Ample leg room and headroom - up to about 6ft 5 is fine I'm 6ft3 and with the roof off I don't get too ruffled unless I go over about 85 mph Lots of other things to like (and the running costs arent too horrendous) but I'm limiting myself to my top three see full Mercedes-Benz SLK review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS
| 2017 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS.
See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.
