| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK and 2006 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2006 | |
| Model | Mercedes-Benz SLK | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Hardtop conv. | 2dr Convertible | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 95.7 in | 107.1 in | -11.4 in |
| Length | 162.8 in | 187.6 in | -24.8 in |
| Width | 71.5 in | 73.9 in | -2.4 in |
| Height | 51.2 in | 55.7 in | -4.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 3241 lb. | 3476 lb. | -235 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.9 gal. | 16.0 gal. | -0.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.0 in | 38.8 in | -0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 52.2 in | 55.4 in | -3.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 53.6 in | -53.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.5 in | 42.7 in | -0.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 36.3 in | -36.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 45.0 in | -45 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 45.2 in | -45.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 30.3 in | -30.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 42.5 in (over 1 rows) | 73 in (over 2 rows) | -30.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 6.4 ft3 | 9.7 ft3 | -3.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.1 ft3 | 9.7 ft3 | 0.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Ford Mustang
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Convertibles
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercedes-Benz models.
