Model Year | 2004 | 2010 | |
Model | Mercury Grand Marquis | Volvo C30 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2004 Mercury Grand Marquis Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2005 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
The bench seats are all day comfortable. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
2005 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Pretty good rear seat space, and it will fit six people. But the center passengers had better be small. Still, the bench seats are very handy. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
2004 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
I have a family of six, and in a pinch this car can carry all of us. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
2003 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Wanted lots of room. Liked pushbutton pedals positioning, so I can move the front seat forward to increase rear seat room. Front seats are way rearward for safety otherwise. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
2003 | 4dr Sedan 224-horsepower 4.6L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
Roomy only by positioning the front seats farther forward, but it is possible to make room for rear passengers. see full Mercury Grand Marquis review |
2010 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Excellent support for very long drives. Passengers in the rear say the same. see full Volvo C30 review |
2010 Volvo C30 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 227hp 2.5L I5 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lack of leg room. This car is a two seater. see full Volvo C30 review |