| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Mercury Milan and 2012 Cadillac CTS Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2012 | |
| Model | Mercury Milan | Cadillac CTS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 107.4 in | 113.4 in | -6 in |
| Length | 190.2 in | 191.6 in | -1.4 in |
| Width | 72.2 in | 72.5 in | -0.3 in |
| Height | 55.8 in | 58.0 in | -2.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 3117 lb. | 3851 lb. | -734 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 18.0 gal. | 0 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 38.8 in | -0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.4 in | 56.7 in | 0.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.0 in | 55.1 in | -1.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 42.4 in | -0.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.8 in | 37.2 in | 0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.5 in | 54.7 in | 1.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.3 in | 54.1 in | -0.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.0 in | 35.9 in | 1.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 79.3 in (over 2 rows) | 78.3 in (over 2 rows) | 1 in |
| Cargo Volume | 15.8 ft3 | 13.6 ft3 | 2.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mercury Milan
| 2009 Mercury Milan Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
I needed to fit 3 child car seats in the back, which it does better than my VW Passat it replaced. see full Mercury Milan review |
| 2009 Mercury Milan Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
My head was squashed into the roof. Could not adjust seat to find a tolerable position. see full Mercury Milan review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
I felt very constrained in all movements. see full Mercury Milan review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Cadillac CTS
| 2012 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Cadillac CTS
| 2012 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 270-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Hard to get in and out of. not much head room. The material is nice. see full Cadillac CTS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Mercury models.
