MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us
Sign up your car for the TrueDelta survey and get free access to all of the data on this page. Click here to get started!

Mercury Milan and Ford Ranger Lemon Odds and Nada Odds for the Year Ending June 30, 2018

An asterisk (*) marks results based on small sample sizes.

Switch to bar graph

Year Make/Model Nada Odds per 100 Cars Lemon Odds per 100 Cars    
39 vehicles, 11.4 months per vehicle, 88500 miles driven2011 Mercury Milan
[?] see reported repairs
  39 vehicles, 11.4 months per vehicle, 88500 miles driven
69 vehicles, 11.6 months per vehicle, 100300 miles driven

Refreshed for this model year.2010		 Mercury Milan
[?] see reported repairs
  69 vehicles, 11.6 months per vehicle, 100300 miles driven

Refreshed for this model year.
25 vehicles, 11.8 months per vehicle, 109600 miles driven2008 Mercury Milan Join or sign in to view   see reported repairs
  25 vehicles, 11.8 months per vehicle, 109600 miles driven
26 vehicles, 11.3 months per vehicle, 121500 miles driven2007 Mercury Milan Join or sign in to view   see reported repairs
  26 vehicles, 11.3 months per vehicle, 121500 miles driven

Return to top

Mercury Milan vs. Ford Ranger Lemon Odds and Nada Odds

Other sources of Mercury Milan and Ford Ranger reliability data provide only averages, which can conceal as much as they reveal. So we also report the percentage of Mercury Milans and Ford Rangers with no repairs at all in the past year and the percentage of Mercury Milans and Ford Rangers that are lemons (required three or more repair trips in the past year). These figures might surprise you.

These stats are promptly updated four times a year, to closely track Mercury Milan and Ford Ranger lemon odds as the cars age. Others can be over a year behind. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable the Mercury Milan and Ford Ranger have been recently.

To see how frequently Mercury Milan and Ford Ranger problems occur, check out our car reliability stats.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Brand Reputation of the Mercury Milan

Mercury Milan Brand Reputation: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD		 Persistent rumors that Ford will drop the line; Sable has already been dropped. The Milan Premier, although touted by Mercury as an upscale car, is nothing more than a re-badged Fusion and not as comfortable as my 2000 Taurus. see full Mercury Milan review
2008 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD		 Ford is not known for beating the Japanese in reliability. But at the time I bought this the Milan was rated more trouble free than Camry by consumer reports. I have only added gas and oil. It runs the same at 54K as 18K. see full Mercury Milan review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Brand Reputation of the Ford Ranger

Ford Ranger Brand Reputation: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range		 I have always loved Ford, I grew up around Ford and they were always very reliable, great styling, and I believe that Ford makes the Best vehicle for the average person see full Ford Ranger review
2003 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 3.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD		 Owners of Rangers are really dedicated to their trucks. see full Ford Ranger review
2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range		 I have owned at least one Ford product since 1962. I have learned to trust their reliability and functionality. I am familiar with maintenance of Ford products and feel comfortable with them. see full Ford Ranger review
2000 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 150-horsepower 3.0L V6
4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range		 Ford is known for good quality, reliability, strength, they hold their value. see full Ford Ranger review