| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Mini Hardtop and 2016 GMC Terrain Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
| Model | Mini Hardtop | GMC Terrain | |
| Engine | turbocharged 1.6L I4 DOHC-4v 208 hp@6000 192 lb-ft@1850 |
3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 301 hp@6500 272 lb-ft@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 97.1 in | 112.5 in | -15.4 in |
| Length | 145.6 in | 185.5 in | -39.9 in |
| Width | 66.3 in | 72.8 in | -6.5 in |
| Height | 55.4 in | 66.3 in | -10.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 2723 lb. | 3988 lb. | -1265 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 18.8 gal. | -8.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 39.8 in | -1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 50.3 in | 55.7 in | -5.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 55.1 in | -55.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.4 in | 41.2 in | 0.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 39.2 in | -1.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 44.7 in | 55.3 in | -10.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 51.3 in | -51.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.9 in | 39.9 in | -10 in |
| Total Legroom | 71.3 in (over 2 rows) | 81.1 in (over 2 rows) | -9.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 5.7 ft3 | 31.6 ft3 | -25.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 24.0 ft3 | 63.9 ft3 | -39.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mini Hardtop
| 2013 Mini Hardtop Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hatch 121-horsepower 1.6L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Rear seat room is extremely limited but it's a Mini...not a mini van! see full Mini Hardtop review |
| 2012 | 2dr Hatch 121-horsepower 1.6L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
We're tall and have room to spare. see full Mini Hardtop review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 GMC Terrain
| 2016 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Mini models.
