| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Mini Hardtop and 2018 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2018 | |
| Model | Mini Hardtop | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 97.1 in | 106.2 in | -9.1 in |
| Length | 145.6 in | 179.1 in | -33.5 in |
| Width | 66.3 in | 72.5 in | -6.2 in |
| Height | 55.4 in | 65.3 in | -9.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 2546 lb. | 3563 lb. | -1017 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 10.6 gal. | 14.8 gal. | -4.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 39.7 in | -0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 50.3 in | 57.1 in | -6.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 55.2 in | -55.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.4 in | 41.0 in | 0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 39.0 in | -1.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 44.7 in | 54.8 in | -10.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 55.3 in | -55.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.9 in | 39.6 in | -9.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 71.3 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -9.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 5.7 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | -25.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 24.0 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | -35.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mini Hardtop
| 2012 Mini Hardtop Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Hatch 121-horsepower 1.6L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Rear seat room is extremely limited but it's a Mini...not a mini van! see full Mini Hardtop review |
| 2012 | 2dr Hatch 121-horsepower 1.6L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
We're tall and have room to spare. see full Mini Hardtop review |
| 2011 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 181hp 1.6L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Small children, petite women and Hobbits may sit in the back on short trips. Otherwise, forget it. It's a MINI! see full Mini Hardtop review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
| 2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Mini models.
