| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2002 Chevrolet Avalanche Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2002 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Lancer | Chevrolet Avalanche | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer
| 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
These seats desperately need more lumbar support. They're okay in short distances, but I really want the Recaros from the Evo a few hours in. Stronger side bolsters would be nice for hoon duty, too. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 Chevrolet Avalanche
| 2002 Chevrolet Avalanche Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2003 | 4dr SUT 285-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Power adjustable leather seats, adjustable pedals, with driver memory for positioning of all that. Seats were still comfortable after twelve hours of driving, with two 20 minute breaks. see full Chevrolet Avalanche review |
| 2003 | 4dr SUT 285-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Three real adults can sit there for hours. Large under-seat space to store backpacks, jackets, etc. Very effective A/C in rear. see full Chevrolet Avalanche review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
