| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2002 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Lancer | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer
| 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
These seats desperately need more lumbar support. They're okay in short distances, but I really want the Recaros from the Evo a few hours in. Stronger side bolsters would be nice for hoon duty, too. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2002 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 4dr SUV, ext. 285-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Great room and comfort for family of 6. Only vechile in this category in 2002 when purchased. 10 years later still in good shape, and happy with vehicle. Would have considered Ford Expedition EL if had been available. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
