| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2012 Ford F-150 Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2012 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Lancer | Ford F-150 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer
| 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
These seats desperately need more lumbar support. They're okay in short distances, but I really want the Recaros from the Evo a few hours in. Stronger side bolsters would be nice for hoon duty, too. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford F-150
| 2012 Ford F-150 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed turbocharged 365hp 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Rear seats are superior than my 1999 F150 in terms of space and the windows will go down. see full Ford F-150 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
