MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Mitsubishi Lancer vs. Nissan Sentra Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Chart is based on 90 fuel economy reports for the Mitsubishi Lancer and 226 fuel economy reports for the Nissan Sentra.

Mitsubishi Lancer L/100km

Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2014 11.1 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 12.4 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 11.4 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2011 8.9 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 11.8 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 11.1 MPG Highway Percentage 16 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 7.5 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2010 8.5 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 10.1 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 9.5 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 8.5 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2009 7.9 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2008 7.3 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 10.9 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 10.2 MPG Highway Percentage 63 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2006 7.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 11.2 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 10.7 MPG Highway Percentage 95 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2005 10.6 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 10.0 MPG Highway Percentage 88 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2003 8.7 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 9.0 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Mitsubishi Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer 2002 8.3 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med none 0 0 60 40 65 11.1  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med hvy 15 0 10 75 70 12.4  
2011 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med none 30 5 5 60 75 11.4  
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 5 20 10 65 63 8.1  
2011 4dr Hatch 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 25 20 25 30 75 8.9  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med none 5 15 40 40 75 11.8  
2010 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med light 19 16 49 16 110 11.1  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med none 10 21 36 33 67 9.3  
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 10 10 0 80 100 7.5  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 0 3 38 59 70 9.3  
2010 4dr Hatch 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 hills med none 6 12 41 41 120 8.5  
2009 4dr Sedan turbocharged 237hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual AWD		 flat med light 6 6 34 55 70 10.1  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat lead none 14 21 22 43 76 9.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 10 21 23 45 88 8.1  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light hvy 20 50 30 0 0 8.5  
2009 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 7 17 1 75 103 7.9  
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med light 7 20 33 40 83 11.2  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 hills med none 10 21 14 56 80 8.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat light none 7 24 10 59 86 9.4  
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 20 80 70 7.3  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD		 flat med none 19 8 23 50 74 10.9  
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 286hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat light none 5 28 5 63 60 10.2  
2006 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med none 16 16 12 57 79 9.4  
2006 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light hvy 0 20 0 80 70 7.0  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual AWD		 flat light none 15 5 40 40 60 11.2  
2005 4dr Sedan turbocharged 276hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat lead none 5 0 0 95 60 10.7  
2005 4dr Sedan 162-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 5 10 10 75 100 10.6  
2003 4dr Sedan turbocharged 271hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 flat med light 1 4 8 88 70 10.0  
2003 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 0 25 0 75 65 8.7  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 7 19 37 37 55 9.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 120-horsepower 2.0L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 18 13 25 45 65 8.3  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Mitsubishi Lancer fuel economy data.

Nissan Sentra L/100km

Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2012 9.2 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2010 9.0 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2010 8.2 MPG Highway Percentage 7 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2009 11.0 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2009 11.8 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2008 9.5 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2008 7.6 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2008 8.1 MPG Highway Percentage 26 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2007 9.1 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2007 9.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2007 8.8 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2007 8.2 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2006 9.1 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2006 8.9 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2006 9.3 MPG Highway Percentage 39 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2005 8.8 MPG Highway Percentage 33 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2005 6.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2005 9.0 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2004 8.4 MPG Highway Percentage 72 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2004 9.5 MPG Highway Percentage 42 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2003 9.1 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2003 11.4 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2003 7.0 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2002 8.6 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2002 9.4 MPG Highway Percentage 5 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2001 5.9 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2001 8.4 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Nissan Sentra Nissan Sentra 2000 10.1 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd L/100km
2012 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light light 12 29 13 45 70 9.2  
2010 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med light 15 25 45 15 60 9.0  
2010 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 flat med none 2 65 26 7 63 8.2  
2009 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med none 0 5 85 10 120 11.0  
2009 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 hills light light 30 50 0 20 110 11.8  
2008 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 11 51 2 36 79 9.5  
2008 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 hills light light 3 15 7 75 70 7.6  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 hills med none 5 1 68 26 66 8.1  
2007 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med none 1 36 34 30 69 9.1  
2007 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 flat med hvy 12 38 9 43 95 9.8  
2007 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 flat light light 4 34 9 53 70 8.8  
2007 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 hills med light 10 8 62 20 65 8.2  
2006 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med none 8 19 27 47 64 9.1  
2006 4dr Sedan 165-horsepower 2.5L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med none 0 10 10 80 63 8.9  
2006 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light light 8 26 27 39 68 9.3  
2005 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 6 10 51 33 70 8.8  
2005 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 hills light light 5 20 0 75 60 6.1  
2005 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 6 12 47 35 100 9.0  
2004 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat lead hvy 8 5 16 72 78 8.4  
2004 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 6 23 29 42 69 9.5  
2003 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 9 19 25 47 74 9.1  
2003 4dr Sedan 165-horsepower 2.5L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat lead none 50 0 30 20 80 11.4  
2003 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat lead none 4 6 5 85 110 7.0  
2002 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med none 5 12 6 78 70 8.6  
2002 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light none 15 25 55 5 60 9.4  
2001 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 flat v.lt light 0 10 10 80 60 5.9  
2001 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat med light 0 0 85 15 70 8.4  
2000 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 flat light hvy 10 15 15 60 60 10.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Nissan Sentra fuel economy data.

Mitsubishi Lancer vs. Nissan Sentra Fuel Economy (L/100km)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Mitsubishi Lancer and Nissan Sentra's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world L/100km based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models and Nissan models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Mitsubishi did improve the powertrain's EPA ratings a few years ago. But they're still only 22 mpg city, 31 highway. Even the portly Dart GT manages 23/33 with a manual transmission. Credit a sixth ratio the Lancer lacks. In my suburban driving, the trip computer regularly reported averages in the high 20s. Other compacts have done better in the same driving, but not by as wide a margin as the EPA numbers would suggest. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2011 4dr Sedan 148-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 I am getting consistent 27-29 MPG on mid-west (flat) back county roads during my commute. I am getting 32 MPG on the highway. My driving style is moderately spirited. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 Uses regular gas and gets about 30 mpg. My Civic SI was getting about the same but used premium. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 Very good millage/power ratio see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan 152-horsepower 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 The car gets average fuel economy in its class, coming in at about 22 mpg city, 30 mpg highway, but it is well above most cars. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
Mitsubishi Lancer Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 It's not as great as you'd expect from an econobox. If this is your biggest concern, this is not the car for you. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2009 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 17 mpg in 2.4 litter my altima that is 2.5 litter i get 23 same driving conditions hmm bigger engin better gas if it always worked out this way i would buy a bmw 335 xdrive see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
2008 4dr Sedan turbocharged 291hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual AWD		 22-24 avarage MPG see full Mitsubishi Lancer review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Sentra

Nissan Sentra Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2014 Aside from some speciality models that cannot be heavily optioned, the Sentra continues to top the rest of its segment in fuel economy, with EPA ratings of 30 mpg city, 39 highway. Well, almost. The new-for-2014 Mazda3 does a bit better with 30/40. Even with its base 1.8-liter engine the Kia Forte doesn't rate nearly as well, 25/36. If you want leather and such you're also getting the 2.0-liter engine, which is rated 24/36. The Sentra's trip computer substantiated its EPA estimates, and then some. On the highway cruising at 65 it reported a two-way average of 47 (up from 40 last year, probably due to warmer temps). In suburban driving the trip computer regularly reported averages of 36 to 37 (up from 32 last year), and on one run to my son's school with a very light foot on the pedals it topped 46. see full Nissan Sentra review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Nissan Sentra

Nissan Sentra Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan 177-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed shiftable CVT FWD		 Great on gas, runs on normal unleaded and still has power. see full Nissan Sentra review
2008 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 Averaging 33+ see full Nissan Sentra review
2008 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 Have gotten 38 mpg on trips, however usually average 32 mpg see full Nissan Sentra review
2008 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 Over 6k miles and average of 32.5mpg hwy/city, 70% hwy. All mountainous terrain. see full Nissan Sentra review
2008 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 Supposed to get over 30 MPG see full Nissan Sentra review
2007 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 30+ miles see full Nissan Sentra review
2006 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 Even with a 2.5l driven like a lunatic I get 25mpg. see full Nissan Sentra review
2006 4dr Sedan 126-horsepower 1.8L I4
4-speed automatic FWD		 Its really high. I can get up to 40 on the highway. see full Nissan Sentra review
2004 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 6 speed manual helps with fuel economy see full Nissan Sentra review
2002 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 With MPG levels of 26 city/ 28 highway (even though you can go as far as 32 mpg highway and obtain an average of 26 mpg on mixed driving with the occasional engine redlining), the fuel economy of this car is pretty adequate. On stock form it will not drain your wallet, even when Nissan has the ECU tuned in the SE-R and SE-R Spec V to run a bit richer than in the Altima. It's no Prius but it's not as bad as, let's say, a modified Mazda rotary engine. Modifications like cold air intake and header will decrease some MPG but the change isn't too drastic either. see full Nissan Sentra review
Nissan Sentra Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 This car obtains awful fuel economy in the city. Mine averages about 20 on a good day in stop and go traffic. On the highway, it has gotten as high as 37, but typically hovers around 30-33. Be prepared to visit the pump often, it takes about 12-13 gallons see full Nissan Sentra review
2008 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 For the price of the car, it offers average-at-best fuel economy. see full Nissan Sentra review
2008 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 the fuel consumption that the computer shows is always 11.4 liters per 100 kms not even close to manufacturer number. see full Nissan Sentra review
2007 4dr Sedan 140-horsepower 2.0L I4
CVT FWD		 Fuel Economy MUCH lower than EPA. Less than others of the same class. see full Nissan Sentra review
2002 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 Poor mileage for a smaller car, closer to sports car turbo type gas mileage. see full Nissan Sentra review
2002 4dr Sedan 165-horsepower 2.5L I4
5-speed manual FWD		 Not practical for everyday see full Nissan Sentra review