| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2016 Toyota Sienna Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Lancer | Toyota Sienna | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 103.7 in | 119.3 in | -15.6 in |
| Length | 180.4 in | 200.2 in | -19.8 in |
| Width | 69.4 in | 78.1 in | -8.7 in |
| Height | 59.7 in | 68.9 in | -9.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 2977 lb. | 4310 lb. | -1333 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.5 gal. | 20.0 gal. | -4.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.6 in | 41.0 in | -1.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.7 in | 65.0 in | -10.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.3 in | 58.6 in | -5.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 40.5 in | 1.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 39.7 in | -2.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.3 in | 64.6 in | -10.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.1 in | 66.1 in | -12 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.9 in | 37.6 in | -1.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.3 in | -38.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 61.1 in | -61.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.3 in | -50.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 36.3 in | -36.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.2 in (over 2 rows) | 114.4 in (over 3 rows) | -36.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.8 ft3 | 39.1 ft3 | -25.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.8 | 87.1 ft3 | -73.3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 46.6 ft3 | 150.0 ft3 | -103.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer
| 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
These seats desperately need more lumbar support. They're okay in short distances, but I really want the Recaros from the Evo a few hours in. Stronger side bolsters would be nice for hoon duty, too. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna
| 2016 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support. The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others. see full Toyota Sienna review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
