| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2010 Toyota Tundra Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2010 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Lancer | Toyota Tundra | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer
| 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
These seats desperately need more lumbar support. They're okay in short distances, but I really want the Recaros from the Evo a few hours in. Stronger side bolsters would be nice for hoon duty, too. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Tundra
| 2010 Toyota Tundra Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 381-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Lots of room for my long legs and seat is comfortable for the long haul. see full Toyota Tundra review |
| 2010 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 381-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
With the front seat back and back seat forward, still have knee room. The recline on the back seat is great. see full Toyota Tundra review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
