| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2014 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2014 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,641 mm | 4,788 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,540 kg | 1,588 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 63 L | 61 L | 2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,326 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 881 mm | 92 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,425 mm | 1,214 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 757 mm | 178 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,265 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 993 mm | 0 mm | 993 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 704 mm | 0 mm | 704 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 422 L | 379 L | 43 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,025 L | 13.4 | -12.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,056 L | 13.4 | -11.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
